In re Erick J. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2025E085696California7,312 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/20/25 In re Erick J. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re Erick J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

E085696

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. DLRI2400019) v.

OPINION

ERICK J.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Mark E. Petersen, Judge.

Affirmed.

Lizabeth Weis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Arlene A. Sevidal, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley and

Britton B. Lacy, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 The People filed a juvenile wardship petition alleging that Erick J. committed one

count of murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.