Vega-Pinto

Vega-Pinto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202524-7685California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUELITA IBETH VEGA-PINTO; No. 24-7685 J.S.C.V.; V.A.C.V., Agency Nos.

A220-128-191

Petitioners, A220-128-192

A220-128-193

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Quelita Ibeth Vega-Pinto (“Vega”) is a native and citizen of El

Salvador.1 She seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Vega’s two minor children seek asylum as derivative beneficiaries, and they separately seek asylum on the same factual bases as she does. For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.