Perez-Ramirez

Perez-Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202524-7611California621 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN FRANCISCO PEREZ-RAMIREZ; No. 24-7611 J.D.P.C., Agency Nos.

A215-823-068

Petitioners, A215-823-069 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Juan Francisco Perez-Ramirez and his minor son, natives and citizens of

Guatemala, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order that

dismissed an appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of their application

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.