Martinez-Juarez

Martinez-Juarez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202523-1267California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMMANUEL MARTINEZ-JUAREZ, No. 23-1267 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-069-431 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Emmanuel Martinez-Juarez seeks review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of the decision of an

immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his application for cancellation of removal under

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Wilkinson v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Garland, 601 U.S. 209, 217 (2024). We review for substantial evidence whether the

agency erred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.