Jose Herrera Reyna v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202517-71221California765 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE SANTOS HERRERA REYNA, AKA No. 17-71221 Jose Santos Herrera, Agency No. A205-714-128 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Santos Herrera Reyna, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an

appeal of an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for

withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.