Anderson

Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., Lp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202524-6164California820 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD ANDERSON; RAYMOND No. 24-6164 KEITH CORUM; JESSE D.C. No. WORTHINGTON; COLLEEN 2:18-cv-00714-DJC-AC

WORTHINGTON,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

EDWARD D. JONES & CO., LP,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 14, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and PITTS, District Judge.**

Plaintiffs Raymond Keith Corum, Jesse Worthington, and Colleen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable P. Casey Pitts, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Worthington1 appeal the district court’s grant of Edward Jones’s motion for

summary judgment on their claims for breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.