Bondi

Aguilar Nepamuceno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202522-700California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO AGUILAR NEPAMUCENO, No. 22-700 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-243-204 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Aguilar Nepamuceno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an

appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying cancellation of

removal. Although we lack jurisdiction to review questions of fact underlying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denials of cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), we have jurisdiction

to review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.