RH Properties v. McBeth CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2025B334051California2,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/21/25 RH Properties v. McBeth CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RH PROPERTIES, B334051

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. 22STCV34236)

SANDRA K. MCBETH,

Defendant and Appellant;

STEVEN MICHAEL TAMER,

Objector and Appellant.

APPEALS from a judgment and an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Kristin S. Escalante, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Michael L. Tusken and Michael Lewis Tusken for Defendant and Appellant. Tamer Law Corp. and Steven Tamer for Objector and Appellant. Law Offices of Tabone and Derek L. Tabone for Plaintiff and Respondent. __________________________________________ In a long-running dispute over…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.