Armani Investments v. Mahmoud CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2025B324203California3,802 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 11/21/25 Armani Investments v. Mahmoud CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ARMANI INVESTMENTS, B324203

LLC,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Super. Ct. No. Respondent, 21VECV01076)

v.

SALAH F. SALEH ELDIN

MAHMOUD,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Valerie Salkin, Judge. Affirmed. Tamer Law Corp. and Steven Michael Tamer for Defendant and Appellant. Vivoli Saccuzzo and Michael W. Vivoli for Plaintiff and Respondent. __________________________ Salah F. Saleh Eldin Mahmoud appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Armani Investments, LLC, after a bench trial in which the trial court found Mahmoud…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.