Stanley W. Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20251:22-cv-00401California7,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 1:22-cv-00401-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

v. EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, et al., (ECF No. 79) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Stanley A. Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ exhaustion motion for summary judgment, filed July 17, 2025. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment official capacity claim regarding plaintiff’s non-soy diet at CDCR against defendant Jeff Macomber, and on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendants Long, Gomez Pimentel, Onyeje, Logan, and Conanan. Defendants filed an answer to the operative complaint on February 10, 2025. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.