Terence C. Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
TERENCE C. DAVIS, Case No. 2:25-cv-09430-WLH-JDE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
GENERAL ATOMICS, ET AL.,
14 Defendants.
16 The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Terence D. 17 Davis (“Plaintiff”), to show cause in writing no later than December 5, 2025, 18 why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice as barred by res 19 judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion). 20 On October 1, 2025, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding pro se, 21 filed the Complaint in this matter against General Atomics, General Atomics 22 Aeronautical Systems, Inc., Rosenberg Sphall and Zeigen, Onslow Bay 23 Financial LLC, Mr. Cooper/Nationstart, and DOES 1 – 50, inclusive 24 (collectively “Defendants”) for: (1) discrimination, (2) “breach of employment 25 contract – at-will”; unlawful termination; (3) “unequal pay / treatment”; and 26 (4) “defamation/blacklisting and in violation of due process rights – 14th 27 Amendment.” (Dkt. No. 1). Prior to this lawsuit,…