Doerer

Robert Justus v. J. Doerer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20251:25-cv-00138California2,865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT JUSTUS, No. 1:25-cv-00138-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

J. DOERER, et al., (ECF No. 17) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claim Act (FTCA). Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on February 3, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On July 31, 2025, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the July 31, 2025 order. Therefore, on September 9, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.