Charles Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security

BACKGROUND

19 This is a case concerns judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner that denied 20 Social Security benefits to Plaintiff Charles Campbell, who is proceeding pro se. (ECF No. 1.) 21 Plaintiff first applied for supplemental security benefits in 2008, and he was found disabled by an 22 administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in 2010. (ECF No. 8-1, Declaration of Christianne Voegele 23 (“Voegele Decl.”), p. 3 ¶ 3(a).) In October 2016, a continuing disability review found Plaintiff 24 was no longer disabled as of that month. (Id. at p. ¶ 3(b).) Plaintiff appealed that 25 determination, and the Appeals Council remanded the case twice, once in 2020 and again in 2022.

1 The Cour takes this procedural background form the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) While the Court construes Plaintiff’s complaint as seeking judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner, Plaintiff has not otherwise provided the procedural background to his case. (Id. at pp. 3-4 ¶¶ 3(c)-(d).) An ALJ issued a new decision in October 2024, and Plaintiff requested that the Appeals Council review this decision shortly…