Romkema

Romkema v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202524-5688California948 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL R. ROMKEMA, No. 24-5688 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 8:23-cv-00832-JC v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jacqueline Chooljian, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Michael Romkema appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security

disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s decision de novo and will not overturn…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.