Palonen

Palonen v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202524-5136California589 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TYE PALONEN, an individual, No. 24-5136 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00023-DMG-RAO v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Tye Palonen appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Song-Beverly Act

claims against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

reverse and remand for further proceedings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.