Bondi

Matias Perez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202525-704California740 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUANA DOROTEA MATIAS PEREZ, No. 25-704 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-670-602 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 20, 2025** San Jose, California

Before: SCHROEDER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER, District Judge.***

Juana Dorotea Matias Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.