Soukhaseum

Soukhaseum v. Gido CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2025B343581California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/24/25 Soukhaseum v. Gido CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

SENG SOUKHASEUM, B343581

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. 24STRO05008, v. 24STFL07845)

YVONNE GIDO,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anne Kiley, Judge. Affirmed. Seng Soukhaseum, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. We resolve this case by a memorandum opinion pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 8.1. Appellant Seng Soukhaseum appeals from an order in which the trial court: (1) granted respondent Yvonne…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.