Sandhu
Sandhu v. Taylor
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TARLOCHAN SANDHU, et al., No. 25-841 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 3:24-cv-07201-LB v.
MEMORANDUM*
THERESA TAYLOR, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel Beeler Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 19, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Appellants are retired public employees and two municipal entities that
challenge the district court’s dismissal of their § 1983 action against the California
Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”). They allege that CalPERS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violated the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, the Eighth Amendment
prohibition…