Sandhu

Sandhu v. Taylor

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202525-841California940 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TARLOCHAN SANDHU, et al., No. 25-841 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 3:24-cv-07201-LB v.

MEMORANDUM*

THERESA TAYLOR, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel Beeler Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Appellants are retired public employees and two municipal entities that

challenge the district court’s dismissal of their § 1983 action against the California

Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”). They allege that CalPERS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violated the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, the Eighth Amendment

prohibition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.