Christopher C. Clark v. CSP Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20252:24-cv-02666California1,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER C. CLARK, No. 2:24-cv-2666 DC CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CSP SOLANO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 19, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint. Good cause appearing, that request will be granted. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed May 22, 2025, is deemed timely and plaintiff’s second amended complaint is before the court for screening. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.