Gessele

Gessele v. Jack in the Box Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202523-2527California15,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

M. SMITH, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSICA GESSELE; ASHLEY No. 23-2522

ORTIZ; NICOLE GESSELE;

D.C. No.

TRICIA TETRAULT; CHRISTINA

3:14-cv-01092- MAULDIN, on behalf of themselves HZ and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

OPINION

v.

JACK IN THE BOX INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant - Appellant.

JESSICA GESSELE; ASHLEY No. 23-2527 ORTIZ; NICOLE GESSELE; D.C. No. TRICIA TETRAULT; CHRISTINA 3:14-cv-01092-

MAULDIN, HZ

Plaintiffs - Appellants, v.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.,

Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 20, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Filed November 25, 2025

Before: CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., AND SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

SUMMARY *

Wage and Hour Claims / Oregon Law

The panel reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court’s judgment in a wage-and-hour case brought by plaintiffs against their former…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.