Garcia-Ortiz

Garcia-Ortiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-2661California523 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANABEL GARCIA-ORTIZ, No. 24-2661 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-282-689 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Anabel Garcia-Ortiz petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision affirming an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her

application for cancellation of removal. We review that decision for substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). evidence, Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1005 (9th Cir. 2025), and we

deny the petition.

To qualify for cancellation, an applicant must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.