Rojas-Espinoza
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-7536California6,296 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536
ESPINOZA; ROBERT SALVADOR-
GOMEZ; DAVID SALVADOR- Agency Nos.
ROJAS; KORINA SALVADOR- A246-606-483
ROJAS, A246-606-482
A246-606-484
Petitioners, A246-606-485
v.
ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, AMENDING
ORDER
Respondent. DENYING STAY
OF REMOVAL
Filed October 24, 2025 Amended November 25, 2025 ROJAS-ESPINOZA V. BONDI
ORDER
The order filed on October 24, 2025 is amended by (1) inserting, in a new line above “PER CURIAM” at the beginning of the order, the following: “Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Daniel P. Collins, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.” and (2) deleting the double-asterisked footnote following “PER CURIAM”. An amended version of the October 24, 2025 order, reflecting these changes, accompanies this order. The stay of the October 24, 2025 order, as set forth in the November 10, 2025 order of the En Banc Coordinator, is not affected by this amendment and remains in effect. ROJAS-ESPINOZA V. BONDI