Rojas-Espinoza

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-7536California6,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536

ESPINOZA; ROBERT SALVADOR-

GOMEZ; DAVID SALVADOR- Agency Nos.

ROJAS; KORINA SALVADOR- A246-606-483

ROJAS, A246-606-482

A246-606-484

Petitioners, A246-606-485

v.

ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, AMENDING

ORDER

Respondent. DENYING STAY

OF REMOVAL

Filed October 24, 2025 Amended November 25, 2025 ROJAS-ESPINOZA V. BONDI

ORDER

The order filed on October 24, 2025 is amended by (1) inserting, in a new line above “PER CURIAM” at the beginning of the order, the following: “Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Daniel P. Collins, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.” and (2) deleting the double-asterisked footnote following “PER CURIAM”. An amended version of the October 24, 2025 order, reflecting these changes, accompanies this order. The stay of the October 24, 2025 order, as set forth in the November 10, 2025 order of the En Banc Coordinator, is not affected by this amendment and remains in effect. ROJAS-ESPINOZA V. BONDI

SUMMARY *

Immigration/Stay of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.