Zhu

Zhu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-5639California765 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEIJING ZHU; QIHAN LYU; MENGXI No. 24-5639 LYU, Agency Nos.

A246-914-402

Petitioners, A246-914-404

A246-914-405

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** San Jose, California

Before: SCHROEDER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. Meijing Zhu and her sons, natives and citizens of China, petition for review

of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.