Zhu
Zhu v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-5639California765 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MEIJING ZHU; QIHAN LYU; MENGXI No. 24-5639 LYU, Agency Nos.
A246-914-402
Petitioners, A246-914-404
A246-914-405
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 21, 2025** San Jose, California
Before: SCHROEDER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER, District Judge.***
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. Meijing Zhu and her sons, natives and citizens of China, petition for review
of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their…