Bondi

Valerio Templadera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-5914California852 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERSYN NILTON VALERIO No. 24-5914 TEMPLADERA I; B. L. H. V. P. I, Agency Nos.

A243-084-093

Petitioners, A243-084-094 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** San Jose, California

Before: SCHROEDER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER, District Judge.***

Gersyn Nilton Valerio Templadera and his son, natives and citizens of Peru,

petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. affirming the denial by an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.