Contreras-Quintero

Contreras-Quintero v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-4729California479 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MASSIEL EUGENIO CONTRERAS- No. 24-4729 QUINTERO, Agency No.

A208-197-916

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Massiel Eugenio Contreras-Quintero seeks review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying his application for cancellation of removal. He also raises for the first time

a claim that his removal order was invalid because he did not concede…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.