Bondi

Cadena Flores v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202524-5409California486 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE CADENA FLORES, No. 24-5409 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-204-466 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Cadena Flores petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

denying his application for cancellation of removal. We review that decision for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substantial evidence, Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1005 (9th Cir. 2025),

and we deny the petition.

To qualify for cancellation, an applicant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.