Piper

Piper v. Commission on Professional Competence CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2025C101026California2,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 11/25/25 Piper v. Commission on Professional Competence CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

CAMILLE PIPER, C101026

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2021- 80003787CUWMGDS) v.

COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONAL

COMPETENCE,

Defendant;

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent

The Commission on Professional Competence (the commission) upheld Camille Piper’s dismissal from employment with the Elk Grove Unified School District (the district). Piper filed a complaint and petition for administrative and traditional mandamus. The trial court denied Piper’s writ claims on the merits, sustained the district’s demurrer to any non-writ causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.