People v. Reid CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2025C101432California2,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/25/25 P. v. Reid CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101432

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22FE007473)

v.

CRAIG LAMAR REID,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Craig Lamar Reid pled no contest to criminal threats. On appeal, Reid contends the trial court abused its discretion because (1) the court did not apply the correct legal standard when it denied his application for mental health diversion and (2) insufficient evidence supports the trial court’s finding Reid posed an unreasonable risk to public safety. We will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2019, Reid was convicted of willful infliction of corporal injury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.