In re O.H. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2025E085170California11,764 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Seven-year-old O.H. and five-year-old A.H. were removed from the care of their

parents, Janet H. (Mother) and Jacob H. (Father), by a protective custody warrant after

Father was arrested on charges of possessing child pornography.

Following the children’s removal, the Riverside County Department of Public

Social Services (the Department) filed a dependency petition alleging the children were at

risk of harm based on Father’s possession of child pornography and Mother’s knowledge

or apparent knowledge of it and minimization of the allegations. While the matter was

pending, the foster parents reported that both children were engaging in masturbation,

and that the children had disclosed both that they used to take showers together as a

family and that their parents taught them how to masturbate when they were two years

old.

The parties proceeded to a contested jurisdictional and dispositional hearing. At

the close of the hearing, the juvenile court sustained the petition, removed the children

from both parents, and over the children’s objection, ordered the Department to provide

family reunification services to both parents.

Mother, Father, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.