Roe 1126 Y.L. v. County of Sacramento CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2025C100322California4,148 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 11/25/25 Roe 1126 Y.L. v. County of Sacramento CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

JANE ROE 1126 Y.L., C100322

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2022- 00331936-CU-PO-GDS) v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Jane Roe 1126 Y.L. brought a childhood sexual assault claim against defendant County of Sacramento pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1.1 The trial court sustained the County’s demurrer without leave to amend, finding that plaintiff failed to timely file “certificates of merit” as required by section 340.1.

1 Further undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

1 Plaintiff appeals, contending the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.