Carasco

David James Pangborn v. Carasco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20252:25-cv-02325California1,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID JAMES PANGBORN, Case No. 2:25-cv-2325-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CARASCO, Defendant. 16 17 David James Pangborn, a state prisoner, brings this action against an indeterminate number of defendants,1 and alleges violations of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. It was originally filed in state court and removed to this court by defendants. ECF No. 1 at 1-2. After screening the complaint, I find that the claims raised in the complaint, brought against multiple defendants, are not sufficiently related to proceed together. Additionally, the claims are, with respect to many of the named defendants, insufficiently pleaded. I will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend so that plaintiff may remedy these deficiencies.

26 27 1 Only defendant Carasco is listed as a defendant on the docket. A review of the complaint, however, indicates that more than one defendant is implicated. ECF No. 1 at 9. I. Screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.