Bjornbak

Bjornbak v. Dugar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202524-1003California1,289 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID BJORNBAK; QIANG No. 24-1003 BJORNBAK, D.C. No. 1:23-bk-1056 Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

LANNY JAY DUGAR,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Gary A. Spraker, Scott H. Gan, and Frederick Philip Corbit, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Appellants David and Qiang Bjornbak seek review of the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying them relief under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)–(5). BAP affirmed the

bankruptcy court’s order on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(b). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.