Rieman

Rieman v. Department of Motor Vehicles CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2025F087870California6,884 words

Opinion

Opinion

Meehan, J.

Filed 11/26/25 Rieman v. Department of Motor Vehicles CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RAYMOND PATRICK RIEMAN,

F087870

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-23-100647) v.

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County. T. Mark Smith, Judge. Middlebrook & Associates, Richard O. Middlebrook and Gabrielle Burnett for Plaintiff and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Chris A. Knudsen, Assistant Attorney General, Katharine Tremblay and Gardenia M. Montero, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- This appeal involves the suspension of appellant Raymond Patrick Rieman’s driver’s license following an administrative per se (APS)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.