Almanza-Adame

Almanza-Adame v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 28, 202524-4117California719 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL ALMANZA-ADAME I, No. 24-4117 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-612-256 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Angel Almanza-Adame, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA dismissed

Almanza-Adame’s appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We review the agency’s denials of the requested relief under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.