Brooks

Cat Brooks, et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20253:21-cv-01418California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAT BROOKS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01418-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Docket Nos. 288, 291 Defendant.

12 The Court has received the Supplemental Weisbrot Declaration, including exhibits, addressing Angeion’s relationship with Blackhawk (the vendor for the prepaid Mastercards). Based on that information, the Court shall not require further action on the part of the parties or Angeion. However, consistent with Judge Davila’s statements in Cabrera v. Google, LLC, No. 5:11-cv-01263-EJD, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169496, at *14-15 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2025), the Court expects that, in the future, Angeion and any other settlement administrator shall provide a full disclosure of all financial arrangements it has with third parties related to the administration of the settlement (e.g., as part of its bid for selection as settlement administrator and, if selected, to the Court to whom the settlement is proposed). The Court also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.