Sternberg

Michael C. Sternberg, et al. v. Cindy Hendrickson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20253:24-cv-04271California1,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL C. STERNBERG, et al., Case No. 24-cv-04271-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION;

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

CINDY HENDRICKSON, et al., IN PART ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 60,

12 This order assumes familiarity with the factual and procedural background of this case, the arguments advanced by the parties in the operative briefing, and the rulings issued in the action to date. Before the Court is Sternberg’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 60. He seeks an order which:

• “[F]inds that California Family Code 76432 is likely unconstitutional on its face 18 1 In his related administrative motion, Sternberg asks for an immediate ruling on the motion for 19 preliminary injunction without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) or advancement of the original hearing date set on the motion. Dkt. No. 67. The Court previously deemed the 20 motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.