Garrett

William Allen GARRETT v. ADJOIN, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20253:25-cv-02806California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA William Allen GARRETT Case No.: 25-cv-2806-AGS-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IFP MOTION

v. (ECF 2) AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT

ADJOIN, et al.,

Defendants.

8 Plaintiff William Garrett moves for appointed counsel. That motion also contains 9 paperwork that the Court construes as a request to proceed in forma pauperis, that is, 10 without paying the usual $405 in court fees. See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 11 (9th Cir. 1999) (“An action may proceed despite failure to pay the filing fees only if the 12 party is granted IFP status.”); 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (“filing fee of $350”); Judicial 13 Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023) 14 (“Administrative fee” of “$55”). Garrett is “homeless,” has no assets, suffers from “severe 15 mental illnesses,” and his disability income barely covers his monthly expenses and ability 16 to provide for his pet “cat.” (ECF 2, at 9–10.) Based on these representations,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.