O'Neill

Kathleen O'Neill v. California Physicians' Service, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20253:25-cv-00876California4,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATHLEEN O'NEILL, Case No. 25-cv-00876-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 43 CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' SERVICE, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Kathleen O’Neill sues California Physicians’ Services, dba Blue Shield of California, and Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging Defendants operated a “sustained criminal enterprise” from 2015 to the present that deprived her of insurance coverage while extracting premiums and federal subsidies. (Dkt. No. 34 ¶ 1.) Plaintiff asserts claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), fraud and deceit, and breach of fiduciary duty. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Dkt. No. 43.) For the reasons explained below, the FAC is DISMISSED with leave to amend. BACKGROUND A. First Amended Complaint Allegations Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.