Laatz

Nicky Laatz, et al. v. Zazzle, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20255:22-cv-04844California11,415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND

v. DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANTS’

DAUBERT MOTIONS AND

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-

IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S DAUBERT

Defendants. MOTIONS

[Re: ECF Nos. 398, 399]

13 Before the Court are eight Daubert motions, four brought by Defendants Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib and four brought by Plaintiff Nicky Laatz.1 Defendants move to exclude the entirety of Plaintiff’s industry expert Stuart Sandler’s testimony, portions of Plaintiff’s technical expert Daniel Garrie’s testimony, the entirety of Plaintiff’s survey expert Sara Parikh’s testimony, and the entirety of Plaintiff’s damages expert Dominic Persechini’s testimony. ECF No. 398 (“Defs.’ Mot.”); see also ECF No. 457 (“Defs.’ Reply”). Plaintiff opposes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.