LaRose

Marco Antonio Mancilla Ruiz v. Christopher J. Larose, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20253:25-cv-02714California2,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO ANTONIO MANCILLA RUIZ, Case No. 25-cv-02714-BAS-SBC

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

v. FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF No. 1) CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, et al.,

Respondents.

18 Petitioner Marco Antonio Mancilla Ruiz filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming he was improperly detained without bond pending adjudication of his immigration matter. (ECF No. 1.) He requests an immediate bond hearing. (Id.) The Government has responded, arguing: (1) this Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the Petition under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(g) and 1252(b)(9); and (2) Petitioner is ineligible for bond and subject to mandatory detention as an “applicant for admission” under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). (ECF No. 7.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Petition and orders a bond hearing for an individual determination of danger or risk of flight. 28 I. LEGAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.