Luis Hernandez v. AT&T SERVICES, INC. et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20252:25-cv-00676California3,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

LUIS HERNANDEZ, Case № 2:25-cv-00676-ODW (PVCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. A T&T SERVICES, INC. et al., DISMISS [19]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Luis Hernandez brings this putative class action against Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. for violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). (Compl., Dkt. No. 1.) Hernandez complains that AT&T Services improperly applies forfeited contributions to reduce future employer obligations, rather than to reduce future participant obligations. (Id. ¶ 1.) AT&T Services moves to dismiss Hernandez’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”) 1–3, 8–9, Dkt. No. 19.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 26

1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.