Tomasenda D. Rivers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20251:24-cv-00836California3,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMASENDA D. RIVERS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00836-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Docs. 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendant. (Doc. 36) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO EXPEDITE AS MOOT

18 (Doc. 37)

20 Currently before the Court are Plaintiff Tomasenda D. Rivers’ (“Plaintiff”) numerous 21 motions challenging the Court’s order issued May 28, 2025, which granted the Commissioner of 22 the Social Security Administration’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss the amended complaint and 23 closed the case. (Doc. 28.) The Court will construe Plaintiff’s motions as motions for 24 reconsideration of the Court’s order issued May 28, 2025.1 25 Plaintiff subsequently filed several motions seeking to vacate the Court’s Order.

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.