Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RAMELLO RANDLE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00230-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. TO DISMISS THIS CASE WITHOUT MORENO, et al., PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 14 Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE FILING THE LAWSUIT

16 (ECF No. 1) 17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

19 Plaintiff Ramello Randle is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 20 this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed a complaint on February 21, 2025, and alleges that 21 Defendants deliberate indifference resulted in poor prison conditions that caused him and his 22 cellmate to have health issues. (ECF No. 1, pp.1, 13). 23 Because it appeared from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his 24 administrative remedies before filing this action, on August 8, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff 25 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to…