Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICHARD BERNARD GRAY, Case No. 1:25-cv-00594-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND GRANTING FINAL LEAVE TO FILE v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 JOHNATHAN MARTIN, et al., (ECF No. 7) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff Richard Bernard Gray, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Johnathan Martin, Joanne Martin, Mary Gonzalez, “Mike,” Ruvya Kahr, Roxanne Miranda, and “Ray.” (ECF No. 1.) On May 21, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and on June 6, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 5), which the Court determined also did not state a claim. (ECF No. 6.) The Court gave Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint, which the Court screens presently. (Id.) I. 26 …