Lacy

Edward Dwanye Lacy, et al. v. Social Security Administration, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20254:25-cv-06256California1,534 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWARD DWANYE LACY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-06256-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DECLINING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

v. DISMISSING CASE

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Re: Dkt. No. 18 et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs Edward Dwayne Lacy and Xavier Dwayne Lacy initially filed a complaint in July 2025 and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 3, 5. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granted the IFP application but found that Plaintiffs’ complaint failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Dkt. Nos. 7, 8. Plaintiffs were given the opportunity to file an amended complaint to address these deficiencies by September 19, 2025. Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint by this September 19 deadline. Instead, they filed a case management statement on September 8 and a motion for entry of default on September 11,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.