Yahiya

Forrest Kendrid v. Yahiya, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:23-cv-01145California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:23-cv-1145 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER YAHIYA, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a former detainee proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action. On or around June 19, 2024, plaintiff was released from the California Medical Facility. (ECF No. 39 at 1-2.) Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion and motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 48.) For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion for extension of time is granted and plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. II. DISCUSSION Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2025. (ECF No. 45.) In the pending motions, plaintiff requests an extension of time to respond to defendants’ summary judgment motion based on plaintiff’s physical condition and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.