Doe

Jane Doe (T.R.S.) v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:23-cv-01676California1,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE (T.R.S.), Case No. 2:23-cv-01676-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO

WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS, PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM INC., et al., (ECF No. 96) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jane Doe (T.R.S.) filed a motion for a protective order and motion to proceed under pseudonym.1 (ECF No. 96.) A hearing was held via Zoom on October 7, 2025. Attorney Patrick Barrett appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Attorney Melissa Reinckens appeared on behalf of Defendants Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc. Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC and Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. (collectively “Wyndham Brand”); attorney Ellen Dew appeared on behalf of Defendant Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”); attorney John Poulos appeared on behalf of Defendant Campbell HHG Hotel Development, LP; and attorney Brian Gunn appeared on behalf Defendant Vitarag Hospitality, Inc. For the reasons that follow, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.