Upshaw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WARD, No. 2:24-cv-0978 TLN AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF REDDING, et al., Defendants.

17 Following the Pretrial Scheduling Conference in this case, see ECF No. 47, plaintiff has filed several motions and requests. ECF Nos. 49, 50, 53, 58. Below the court addresses these matters and sets the case for a further status conference to discuss general issues related to the course of litigation. I. Requests for Reconsideration (ECF Nos. 49, 50) The documents filed at ECF Nos. 49 and 50 both expressly seek review by the assigned district judge, Hon. Troy L. Nunley, of the ruling of the undersigned at the pretrial scheduling conference denying a discovery motion (ECF No. 45) without prejudice to refiling in compliance with the applicable rules governing discovery. Neither ECF No. 49 nor ECF No. 50 is captioned as required by Local Rule 303(c), which provides that such requests “shall be captioned…