Michael Alan Dean Hill v. El Dorado County Sheriff, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:24-cv-02752California924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, No. 2:24-cv-2752 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER, FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is an El Dorado County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 27, 2025, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint which the court screens. As with plaintiff’s first two pleadings, the second amended complaint violates joinder rules. Under Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff cannot bring unrelated claims against different defendants. Simply put, plaintiff cannot join claims against defendant B that are not sufficiently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.