Mary Louise Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:24-cv-03105California1,869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-03105-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF Nos. 15, 17) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Mary Louise Williams, proceeding in this action pro se, seeks judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for child’s insurance benefits.1 In her summary judgment motion, Plaintiff appears to be seeking survivor’s benefits on her deceased father’s record, but does not identify any error made by the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The Commissioner opposes Plaintiff’s motion, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and seeks affirmance. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED and the Commissioner’s cross-motion is GRANTED. / / / 27 This action was referred to the magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(15) and proceeds on the consent of all parties. (ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12.) I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.